Dr. Paul 0:00
Welcome to against the wind and doctors and science under fire. This is Dr. Paul your host. Today's show features an extensive interview with Dr. Toby Rogers. This gentleman this man spent days listening to all the FDA meetings that were being presented to make a decision about whether or not these vaccines, the COVID jabs, were going to be approved for kids down to the age of six months. He then sat through two more days of the ACI P the Advisory Committee on Immunization practice meetings, where it just felt like they were rubber stamped. And then of course, boom, everybody's celebrating these vaccines have been approved for six months and up and you know, that means they become part of the regular schedule. And you know what that means, folks? No liability anymore for these experimental jabs that never had long term testing, they bypassed animal studies. And we already have a mountain of evidence and data showing harm. It is on all of us to get this information out. Everybody we care about who might have children, because they are putting a target on kids who just don't need this. They do not need these jabs. It's all harm, no benefit. Enjoy this show. I'm Dr. Paul.
Dr. Paul, coming to you from the heart. My topic today is independence and the word freedom. As a country, we just celebrated the Fourth of July Independence Day. And it's a big celebration. For many, I happen to have been blessed to be at the Oregon coast for that particular celebration. It was a sunny day the whales were out. It was beautiful, it felt peaceful. But it wasn't peaceful. For everybody. Those of you who are watching the news, or you've seen on social media, a lot of unrest in our country, a lot of people are having a push back feeling about even celebrating Independence, because they just don't feel like they have freedoms that they should have had by now. I just want us all to be cognizant of the fact that many paid the ultimate price for a mound of freedom that we experienced in this country that is indeed still there, compared to many places in the world. But let's focus now I'm a pediatrician, I'm a dad, let's focus on our children. It's about our kids, and what legacy we leave for them. Think about your toddler or your young child. And what does independence mean for them. They need to learn to become independent of us, right? The parents, but it's a partnership, right? So there is also responsibility. As you become more independent. There's freedom that we achieve as we become more independent. As a parent, as someone who takes care of and interacts with kids. We want to raise up secure, independent, young people who will become the next generation of leaders. And that's our goal. But as a country, let's not lose the fact that we fought so hard for so many of the freedoms we still do have, even though it feels like they're slipping away. In many cases. We are all in this independently. But together. I'm Dr. Paul.
Welcome Dr. Toby Rogers to against the wind doctors in science under fire. What a privilege to have you on the show.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 3:19
Well, thank you so much for having me on the show. I've been such a huge fan of yours for a long time. I was working on my PhD down in Australia when the vaccine friendly plan came out. Yeah, back in 2016. Was it? Yep. And that book was a revelation. I quoted it extensively in my doctoral thesis. And I've probably bought 20 copies over the years to give difference. It has saved so many lives. So I've been indebted to you and grateful to you this whole time. I'm delighted to be on the show and have a chance to chat with you today.
Dr. Paul 3:52
Well, thank you for that. And, folks, you need to understand that Dr. Rogers here has a PhD in Political Economy, from the University of Sydney when I guess you read my book, but your thesis doctoral thesis, the political economy of autism, I think threw you into that world right of what's going on with chronic health. And you've since studied all the different classes of toxicants that increase autism risk. He then went on, I think, or have had a master's as a public health degree from the University of California Berkeley, that is a very strong, strong program. And I got to meet you because of your speaking and writing and teaching that you do on chronic illness and children and then the medical freedom work that you've been doing. You have an amazing substack Toby rogers.substack.com. Folks, if you want to read some of this man's incredible work, you're doing good work for the for the world. So thank you for being on the show. Well, thank
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 4:47
you. And just one small note. It's a master of public policy degree from the University of California Berkeley rather than public health, but Gotcha. Politics, policy and public health they all intersect these days. And one of the things that I did in my, in my public policy degree was to look at these sorts of risk benefit analysis documents, and I got good at tearing those apart. Well, I do that all the time now in the medical freedom movement, where I tear apart the FTAs, risk benefit analysis documents, and I understand how these sorts of things are rigged. And I know what makes for a good risk risk benefit document, and a bad risk benefit document. And so those skills have have served me well since then.
Dr. Paul 5:32
And they're skills that most of us don't have. So this is why I wanted to get you on the show. You really have the ability to sift through the mess that's put together to try to make something sound like it, it is what it's not. So most impressively, I was aware that you were attending all these meetings that were going on in June, from the FDA, the verb PAC meetings, and you can describe what that means. And then the CDC, ACI P meetings, the whole thing just looked like a freight train there. They're the combination of what they've been trying to do, which was to get the COVID jabs onto the childhood schedule. Reason being I think you can validate this or not that once that occurs, then they can have liability free product ongoing.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 6:24
Yes. So June was completely heartbreaking. The FDA and CDC just completely trampled scientific norms. They ran roughshod over proper methods, and they just abandoned science candidly, over the course of it turns out there were 10 meetings over the course of June that I watched via zoom to document for history, exactly what the FDA and CDC were up to, there were four meetings of the FTAs, so called expert advisory committee, the vaccines and related biological Products Advisory Committee, there are four meetings of the CDC, so called expert advisory committee, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. And then there are two other meetings in there, there was the Advisory Committee on childhood vaccines, and then there was the National Vaccine advisory committee in there as well. Each of these meetings are five to eight hours long. And they're just completely heartbreaking because what you want from a process like that is good science, you want the best of the best coming together, having the hard conversations we need to have as a country, sifting through the evidence to see you know, what the signal is, what the noise is, and make good, good decisions on behalf of the country. And none of that happens. What happens instead is politics. These people have made a decision to get these products across the line, no matter what, no matter how bad the data is, no matter how many harms are uncovered in the clinical trial. It's It's shocking when I came into this process, working on my PhD. Starting back in 2015, I assumed that the FDA and CDC are the best of the best they do high quality work that they know what they're talking about. It quickly becomes apparent that that's not the case, the science that's talked about in these meetings would fail a high school biology class, it's poor. It's shocking how bad the evidence is. And so so I just I watched meeting after meeting and wrote about it on my substack and, and really saw the collapse of public health, the collapse of allopathic medicine and the CDC and FDA just giving up on on science and medicine altogether, in order to reward the pharmaceutical industry.
Dr. Paul 9:08
Yeah, fellow physicians who might be watching who have not yet come to the realization that the CDC is simply a marketing agent for pharma at this point. Yes, they do a good job in some respects of collecting certain data. But you and I also watched over the COVID story of the last two, three years that they would stop collecting data that became inconvenient for their narrative, right. So while they have the manpower and the funding to do incredible work, they choose it seems to only do work that will benefit Pharma. Is that your assessment?
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 9:52
Sadly, it is and brings me no joy to reach that conclusion. I want these agencies to succeed. They're very important. Unfortunately, they're completely captured. And CAPTCHA is a term that comes from political science. And it's when agencies are supposed to be protecting the public good. And instead they become captured both financially and culturally, by the industries that they're supposed to regulate. And so that's what's happened here. It's it's extreme regulatory capture, you'll actually see in these meetings, that that FDA and CDC when they're giving their presentations, they'll often say we, when we're, they're referring to the manufacturer, when they're referring to Pfizer and moderna, they say we, they see themselves as one in the same part of the same team with the pharmaceutical industry, they don't see themselves as adversaries, they see themselves as partners with industry. So there's nobody there looking out for our interests. There's nobody there who is articulating the needs of children who's speaking for families. It's it's it's two branches of the same industry, pushing forward a marketing plan. That's That's what these meetings are.
Dr. Paul 11:09
Yeah, I've actually just thinking back, I was invited to be on a panel to help assess the HPV vaccine. So I'm invited big dinner, and we want you to give us your input so we can assess the HPV vaccine, it turned out the whole thing was strategies for rolling it out. It had nothing to do with whether or not it was a good idea or not. And if you're describing the same thing, I know you've written about this moderna and Pfizer, they had their own risk benefit documents, right? And what did those show?
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 11:46
Yes, so let's take each one at a time. So prior to these meetings, so prior to an FDA Expert Advisor committee meeting, or prior to the CDC expert advisory committee meeting, they released documents that the FDA released his documents 48 hours before the meeting, a CDC releases documents 24 hours before the meeting, that's that's as much time as the public gets to look at these documents. So I waited my computer for these documents to show up online, I download it instantly, I print them, and I start tearing them apart. I work through them over the course of two days. And I published my results on substack prior to the meeting in hopes of shifting the debate. And so when it comes to the FDA, there's two sets of documents, the FDA creates a risk benefit document. And then the sponsor Pfizer Madera, in this case, creates presents their case for why they should get emergency use authorization. And these documents are willful, they should be robust. They shouldn't be the sort of thing that anyone in the public can point to and say, hey, the FDA has figured this out, and and we're in good hands and these products are safe, and we can proceed. That's not what happens at all. So let's talk about Madonna first. Darren applied a year ago, to inject its mRNA shot into adolescence into into older kids. And the application has been held up for a year because studies from around the world so that this shot increases myocarditis risk. We have very good studies from Europe and Nordic countries, showing that the Madonna shot increases myocarditis risk between two fold and seven fold as compared with the baseline. So so the Madonna shot had been hold held up for a year in this age group because of these concerns. What I was interested to find out is, wait a second, why is this process been restarted? The data hasn't gotten any better. In the meantime, how on earth is it proceeding for a vote before this committee given these concerns, and it's right there in the FTAs risk benefit document. It's page 19 and 20. If anybody wants to look it up, and here's what happened. And it's completely shocking. I figured that what happened. My guess my hunch going into this was that the FDA had given Maderna an extra year to massage the data, right to lose a few troublesome kids from the from the clinical trial that made their results look bad to group the results in a certain way so as to make the results look more favorable. That's not what happened. What happened in the year between when Maderna applied and when the vote actually happened in front of the FDA. Is that the FT EAA laundered Madonna's data for them. The FDA laundered Medanos data for them. So here's what happened over the course of that year. FDA and CDC put their fixers on minimizing the signal of myocarditis that was showing up in these studies and in these clinical trials. So the CDC has three full time fixers, who all they do is manipulate data to hide vaccine safety signals. It's Matt Oster, Tom Shimabukuro, and John Sue. And so over the course of the year, they produced four papers. And they brought in Nicola Klein at Kaiser Permanente. And they publish these in various journals, because journals want to hear the story that these things are safe and effective. And they sliced and dice to massage the data, changed definitions categories, what happened, and shrank the signal from two fold down to a 7% to 50% increased risk of myocarditis. So even with all their manipulations, which are complete junk science, and completely unwarranted, they still were, couldn't make the signal go away, the myocarditis signal is still there. Even with all their manipulations, and the increased risk, according the CDC, and FDA is now 7% to 50% will already there. Madana Farrell's any reasonable risk benefit
analysis. And the reason I say that is, the health benefits from the sides in these clinical trials were small to non existent. And a couple problems with these trials is they're always intentionally too small. They enroll too few people that's on purpose to hide harms. And they're always too short. The Pfizer trial in adults was six months and then they wipe out the the placebo group and inject all them with the vaccine as well. So so there's no long term safety data whatsoever. In children, they wiped out the control group even sooner, sometimes the results are only from four months. Sometimes the results are only from two months. Well, when you shrink the trial like that, you're also going to get fewer health benefits to right, if the shots actually did work. You're not gonna find many cases of myocarditis in there, either. So, so there were no benefits. In the clinical trial, these massive harms anywhere from 7% to 50%. increased risk of just one side effect myocarditis, there are a lot of other side effects. But if you if you look at the 26 studies from around the world, they're very high quality peer reviewed, they show a two fold a seven fold, increased risk and myocarditis. So it fails any reasonable risk benefit analysis, and the FDA approved it. I think in that case, there was there's one abstention the new guy abstain because he was confused about something but other than that was about a 21. To one to proceed with a shot that we know is going to cause more harm than benefit. So that's, that's Maderna. That was a lot is okay, if I walked through the Pfizer PCs, please do. So. Pfizer had a different set of problems, and it unfolded like this. Pfizer had a clinical trial over the summer, in 2021. The clinical trial concluded in the fall, and Pfizer thought that their clinical trial is going to work. Right. So they wiped out the placebo group. They gave their vaccine to everyone in the placebo group. Well, when they actually started looking at their data in October and November, they found out the shot didn't work. The clinical trial failed. So now you have somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 503,000 kids in the trial, you have no placebo group anymore. You have no you have no RCT anymore at all. And the clinical trial failed. So they had to cobble together a new clinical trial with a third dose out of the ashes of this failed clinical trial. So it appears that they enrolled some new people and then they kept some of the people from the older clinical trial and they tried to they tried to show that it worked and this was during the middle of the Omicron wave. So what was happening was all these children had natural immunity already, right by February we had 75% of kids with with natural immunity. And and by now it's probably closer to 100% of kids have natural immunity. So
so there just weren't any health benefits to look at. In the clinical trial. The shot made no difference on health benefits and So they do this weird thing called immuno bridging that I've written a lot about. They said, Okay, well, the health, okay, we didn't show any health benefits in the clinical trial, don't worry about that. We're going to switch to bloodwork, we're going to look at antibodies in the blood, don't compare antibodies in the blood of children to antibodies in the blood of adults. And we're going to try to make some sort of comparison to suggest that in the future, somehow the shots will be protective, even though they weren't in the clinical trial. That's how preposterous the FDA processes that they allow this sort of junk science to proceed. And I will add, the FDA expert advisory committee acknowledges that there are no known correlates of protection in connection with COVID-19 shots. What does that mean? It means you can't use any of these proxy measures like antibody levels to predict whether who will be immune to Coronavirus. So, at the end of it all by the time so so Madonna applies to FDA to to have their shots approved for little kids. Pfizer has nothing at this point. They rush together and application they submit the next day. their so called clinical trials this this third shot in little kids only had 10 COVID cases in it 10 COVID cases, wow. Three in the treatment group seven in the placebo group. And they said well, therefore it works. No, come on. You cannot base national policy. Oh my god. 19 million children on 10 cases of this cobbled together rickety janky Pfizer study that failed, and then they add a piece.
Dr. Paul 21:46
That's insanity. I 10 cases in my practice from the last month. They all are very healthy did fine. No big deal. Let's compare. Yes, it's garbage.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 21:58
It's outrageous. It's and look, I'm a political economist, I shouldn't be able to run circles around the science that the FDA and CDC do. And but I can because it's it's just junk. It's if you have if you have any college level statistics, you can figure out how the process is rigged. And it's it's it's abundantly clear that these dots cause more harms than benefits. Yeah, it's unquestionable, and then for the FDA and CDC to then approve these things unanimously. They are living in a parallel universe where facts are not allowed to intrude upon their biases. It is surreal to watch these people were. Yeah, I,
Dr. Paul 22:48
I couldn't have done it. I mean, yes, I would have forced myself if I needed to. But that had to be just painful to watch. I mean, these trials are so small. I mean, you you shared those small numbers of just 10 cases. And I think one of the kid trials had like, 60 Some kids in it, and you're gonna base national policy on this.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 23:04
They're vanishingly small, and the FDA has the power to stop them from doing that. And the FDA never, never noticed upon proper standards.
Dr. Paul 23:13
Yeah, I understand. There was one slide in one of these decks that you reviewed, or where it was talking about the COVID leading cause of death and children, I think, was the quote, what did you uncover there?
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 23:25
Yeah, so that's an interesting case of, of what's called Popular epidemiology sort of Epidemiology from below. The CDC rushed out essentially a marketing slide saying that that COVID-19 was the the fourth or the fifth leading cause of death in children. Well, people on Twitter took a look at that. And they thought, you know, that doesn't look quite right. And so a mom in Georgia, started working through the data and looking at the references and that sort of thing. And what she found is that the CDC was intentionally double counting. So the CDC took all of the fatalities from COVID over the course of two years, and took that number and compared it to fatalities from accidents and other things in children over the course of one year. So they double counted on purpose. And and so this mom and George's, she wrote to the study authors, there was a study out of the UK and said, Well, you made this this mistake, and pointed it out to them. And the study authors corrected it. The study authors said, You know what, you're right. They they rewrote the preprint. And it moved COVID As a leading cause of death down to somewhere around ninth or 10th. But even that's misleading, because the number one cause of death in little kids is accidents. So if one is really concerned about the safety and well being of children No one should mandate fences around swimming pools, dollar for dollar, that's the biggest bang for your buck that would that would reduce more fatalities than than anything. And, but, but accidents are 25 times more harmful than then other categories. So if you actually broke it out into separate types of accidents, each of those would be their own category of harm. And then COVID-19 as a cause of death would fall even though, as you know, for healthy children, the risk of COVID-19 is vanishingly small. And for the FDA and CDC to pretend that there's a health emergency in connection with SARS, cov, two in this population is just dishonest. And there's far better treatments that are available, one could treat it with Eva machten or hydroxychloroquine or 20 different other treatments for either prophylaxis early treatment, there's the notion that we should vaccinate them with this shot that all the evidence shows causes more harms and benefits. It's, it's it's really outrageous in not doing proper science.
Dr. Paul 26:16
Yeah, it's insane. I have over 6000 patients, all children, I'm a pediatrician, not a single child has ended up in the ER to my knowledge, definitely no hospitalizations, course, no deaths. Almost, as you pointed out, almost everybody's had it by now. So I've made a standard practice over the last two, three months of asking every patient I see. So as your family have been hit by COVID. Every time I think maybe one exception. Oh, yeah, we had it in January. Oh, yeah. We just had it last month. Oh, we've had it three times, you know. And in many of those cases, they did some testing. So they actually proved a COVID positive test, even though we know there's problems with the testing as well. But the point is, the kids all did well. They're doing just fine. What would happen to those 6000 kids, patients of mine, if they were vaccinated for this COVID jab? First of all, they're already immune. Right? So and they've got natural immunity. And secondly, I mean, the risks of just myocarditis, not to mention all the other problems, which we can debate as well. You're right, it's insanity. It is absolutely insane. Just just for amusement sake, what did they present as the benefits of these vaccines? I mean, surely, in these days and days of testimony, you've got the likes of Paul Offit, and all these other top top dogs in the vaccine world. They're trying to get this approved, obviously, because that's the goal. They must be saying something about benefits.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 27:45
Yeah. So the way that they proceed is they exaggerate the risks of SARS, cov, two virus, they inflate the benefits of the shots. So they'll say things like, these are a miracle, and they'll use just marketing numbers, right? 80%, effective, 90% effective, they'll say things like, well, we see that this is working in adults. And and What's What's odd is, occasionally there'll be a slide from CDC or FDA, that's, that's honest, that actually shows negative effect efficacy from the shots during during the Omicron wave the slides during the presentation in the recent meetings, so that that Pfizer has negative efficacy after the first dose until until well after the second dose, and then there's a little bit of benefit, and then it declines later. Occasionally, the truth comes through. And then the committee just ignores that they just blow right on by that. Any inconvenient facts, they just keep on going with the narrative. They just keep on going with the mantra that chant safe and effective, safe and effective. And then they go to great lengths to minimize harms. They just don't pay attention to adverse events. And so they bring their fixers into the meeting and they bring in Tom to recupero to to massage the data in front of them and to hide the signals of myocarditis and other harms. So, as you surely know, the vaccine adverse event reporting system has shown 29,000 deaths following COVID-19 sites, since they are introduced in December of 2021. And in children in children five to 11. The Pfizer shot has only been on the market a short while just since October of 2021. Already, last time I checked there were somewhere in the neighborhood of 115 fatalities from the site. And we know that that's an undercount. We know that that bears significantly undercounts harms from from vaccines by a factor of anywhere from from 10 To 100, the CDC, quite literally acknowledges one fatality and kids following COVID-19 shots, even though we have evidence of at least 115, probably much more than that. And even though we have evidence to 29,000 reports of fatalities, following COVID-19 shots and adults, they don't acknowledge any of those either. And in fact, at the FDA is meeting their lead vaccine guy, this guy, Peter marks, twice, he had a meltdown about about the vaccine adverse event reporting system. And he one day it was trending on Twitter during the middle of this FDA meeting. And he's like, no, no, you can't draw causation from from the very system. Well, nobody's saying that you can, what we're saying is, it's the only reporting system that we have. It's existed for 32 years. It's the canary in the coal mine. The purposes of this system is to identify signals in the data that that merit further review. But what happens with FDA and CDC is there is no further review. They just dismiss these harms out of hand, because that contradicts the narrative. And they just proceed. So it's, it's a shocking process, exaggerating risks of the virus, exaggerating benefits from the shot and minimizing adverse events, none of those things that they do hold up to even the most minimal scientific scrutiny. And that's, that's that standard operating procedure for these committees. It's outrageous.
Dr. Paul 31:38
Yeah. Now, this has been a playbook of theirs all along, is to have very short studies, very small groups and destroy the control group. And I mean, they did this with this technology is criminal, you know, to take the Pfizer and Maderna large trials. I mean, those trials were large enough, if they had just kept the control group, we would already know by now, it was a disaster. But they use this little trickery of saying, well, it's not ethical to force these poor people who are in the control group, not allow them the opportunity to get vaccinated and get the protection. And so they scare the control group into getting vaccinated and they wipe out their whole study making it virtually worthless. They're not driving me nuts.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 32:21
Yeah, they're not doing science. And anybody who thinks that the FDA and CDC are looking out for the well being, they're making a category error. These agencies no longer exist to protect our well being the only person protecting the health of children is parents and doctors, including you. But there's there's vanishingly few doctors who are as aware as you are. But parents are on their own, they need to do due diligence, they need to read this evidence for themselves. I help with that process somewhat by by breaking it down on my sub stack into more manageable pieces for people who are busy. But But FDA and CDC do not look out for your house, they launder data on behalf of the pharmaceutical industry. That's what they do.
Dr. Paul 33:11
Yeah, absolutely. So what do you think, Toby are the long term implications of these decisions in this new rollout of the COVID? Vaccine down to six months?
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 33:22
Yeah. So there's one other key piece of this series of disasters meetings we have to talk about, which is the very last meeting, and then I'll get into the implications of all this, if that's okay. Yeah. So the last meeting, the Capstone meeting of all this was on June 28, the FDA met to consider what's called the future framework. And it is so Orwellian, that that, to describe it plainly. Risks appearing unhinged, because the FDA is so completely out of control. But But let me let me describe what happened. So FDA knows that the shots are not performing well. They know that they're what they call breakthrough infections. Well, that means a shot isn't really working. They know that, that the virus is evolving very quickly. The fact is SARS cov. Two was never a good candidate for a vaccine. Because it evolves too fast. We don't have a vaccine against the common cold. We don't have a vaccine against HIV in spite of decades of trying, because these viruses evolve too fast. And the flu shot tends to fail each year, for the same reason, because the flu evolves so quickly, so they never should have entered this territory to begin with. But they did and now they're just going to double down on their failed experiment. So they know the shots are failing. They know that this virus is evolving rapidly, and so heavin into this Fall, they know they need to reformulate the shots, to try to make them work. But I see no reason why they're suddenly going to be able to make them work. Now, when they couldn't make them work over the last two years, there's no new sort of approach that's going to solve the underlying weaknesses in this technology. So but if you reformulate a single molecule in these vaccines, well, you would need to do a new clinical trial to test for safety. And one would also need to go through the FDA regulatory process again, but the pharmaceutical industry doesn't want that. Right. The pharmaceutical industry doesn't want new clinical trials, because they they very well could fail. They don't want new regulatory review, because that's when the public gets to look at these the weak data and start speaking up as we've been doing. So the pharmaceutical industry with the conclusion of the FDA figured out a way to rig the process in perpetuity. And the way they do it is this thing called the future framework. So what they've said is, well, the flu shot every year, we reformulate that. And indeed, there's this whole global flu surveillance system. And then, and then these public health officials get together and stroke their chins, and they choose for variants to go into the flu shot every year. Well, and they don't go through new clinical trials each year, they just get grandfathered in and safe and effective, because they're they're called biologically similar to the existing flu shots. Well, here's what's sad about that is the flu shot. process doesn't work either. So the CDC presented evidence to show last year, the flu shot was somewhere between eight and 14% effective. And then there was a there was a flu outbreak at the University of Michigan. And it turned out the flu was zero, the flu shot was 0% effective. So they have this whole elaborate political theater to choose the flu shot each year, and it fails completely. And what the FDA has said is what we're going to do is we're going to do the same thing with COVID-19 shots. We're so smart, we're gonna play god, this is the FDA speaking. And they're gonna, they're gonna choose now two variants to put into the flu shot every year. And in the process. They're gonna skip clinical trials altogether. For COVID be no COVID-19 clinical trial data in humans going forward. So this meeting on the 28th they seriously got together and said, well, we want a new shot based on the original Wuhan strain, and based on ba four ba five variants of the Omicron
variant of Coronavirus. Now, there was no data whatsoever on the effectiveness of Coronavirus SATs against this new variant. I should correct that. Pfizer had a tiny study in eight mice. And they were these these these mice that were specifically genetically engineered to have an exaggerated immune response. Literally, they had data from eight mice. That was all the data that they had. And the FDA voted unanimously this expert advisory committee voted unanimously to approval by valence shot to two variants for the fall. That's going to have absolutely no clinical safety data whatsoever. The FDA wants to inject hundreds of millions of Americans, adults and children with a shot with no clinical safety data. That's the plan going forward. And was that approved? It was approved 19 to two I think I said I misspoke or that I think I said as unanimous, but it was approved 19 to two Paul Offit of all people voted no, can you believe that? Paul off, it's never met a vaccine and then lined up, he voted no. And not only that, the next day, he went out and wrote an op ed in stat news that poured cold water on us this idea and said it was a bad idea. So he's still fighting to try to try to nix this proposal. But it's just, it's madness. So So FDA, CDC and the pharmaceutical industry, they were losing the game right there, their shot didn't work. There was negative efficacy, we have evidence of antibody dependent enhancement, things are going badly. What they're going to do instead is is double down on a failed strategy and just throw the chessboard against the wall and stop playing the game altogether and just stop doing clinical trials because Clinical Trials candidly made them look bad. And they don't want to look bad anymore. And so now they're just going to skip safety data altogether. And just and say, just trust us. We're good. We've got this figured out, we know what we're doing. And they don't they have no idea what they're doing.
Dr. Paul 40:15
No, it's It's absolutely horrifying and scary. For the the scary part is, you and I are aware of what's going on. And some of our viewers watching, I think you know what's going on. But so many of our friends loved ones fellow fellow physicians, I mean, the majority of pediatricians so therefore, the majority of parents in this country who go to their pediatric office, trusting their doctor to give them the best advice, they will get advised to take this shot, this jab that has only harm, no benefit, no testing, as you've pointed out, going forward is just pure whatever we want to put into this jab. Let's see what happens.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 40:49
It's pure fantasy. Yeah, it's so postmodern, you know, post modernism says there's no hard, fast, universal truths in the world truth. Only perspective? Well, it's sort of we have this postmodern FDA, this postmodern CDC that says, Well, you know, the truth is what we think it is, don't worry about that data, the data is we don't pay attention to data anymore at the FDA and CDC. And, and and so to follow up on your earlier question, the FDA thinks that they've won this great victory because they had the votes, and they got these things across the line in this this series of rigged meetings over the course of June. And so I think they're gonna pat themselves on the back and take a long vacation and, and candidly start preparing for these well paid jobs that they're gonna get at Pfizer and moderna as a reward when they retire early. From FDA and CDC, they're gonna go cash in and by working for these companies. But But what they don't realize because I don't know how they think, but they certainly don't think in terms of long term is they've really sealed their own demise, they have not thought this through. So these shots are not popular. The public is on to them. Only half of adults have gotten a third dose, only 25% of adults have gotten a fourth dose. So what percent of the population is going to get a fifth dose of a shot that has no clinical safety data is going to be vanishingly small, it's going to be the hypochondriacs in the population. But that's about it. And children, only about a third of the older kids, five to 11 have gotten to have the Pfizer shots. The rollout in little kids is not going well, for the CDC and FDA in the first week, when one would assume that all these parents would rush out, only 1% of parents have gone out to vaccinate their little kids because people are waking up to what's happening. And so what the FDA has done is guaranteed the demise of the FDA and CDC, no one's going to trust them, no one's going to listen to them going forward. I think they've also damaged allopathic medicine going forward. And I'm pretty sure they've damaged or damaged their beloved vaccine program going forward, as well. And so what's going to happen over the coming months and years is that lots and lots of people are going to be maimed and killed by the shots. And when that happens, those people are never going to trust the FDA and CDC, again, those people are going to rise up against these criminal actors within the FDA and CDC who have allowed this to happen. The backlash is going to be massive. Peter marks at the FDA sends more people into the medical freedom movement, then Bobby Kennedy and del Bigtree combined. Because he's so incompetent because he's so criminally corrupt. He has grown our movement by 1020 fold over the last year, all of those people are going to become single issue medical freedom voters who again, demand accountability from these institutions going forward. So it breaks my heart to think about the level of hardship that's coming. You're gonna see this in your practice as people who have gone and gotten vaccinated through you know, these pop up clinics and all that are going to come in with injuries, we're going to have to get really good at treating vaccine injuries, but political backlash is going to wipe out the CDC and the FDA and all the people who allow this to happen. I don't think the short term thinkers the FDA and CDC have really thought this through this is going to end badly for them. Yeah,
Dr. Paul 44:54
I think it's going to end badly for public health officials that these departments are all overrun. And then and corrupt, pushing the same narrative and it's not going to bode well for your allopathic traditional mainstream Doc's I mean, pediatricians who are pushing a dangerous product on there, that the population they're charged with protecting right? And I know they're doing it, mostly, I think they truly are blind to what they're doing. These are not bad people. All they read, and all they hear is the CDC nonsense, the public health nonsense, the lies, the throwaway journals are just filled with all this stuff. And anybody that tries to present the other side of the story, the actual data, we get marginalized. Right? I mean, I've got to ask you as, as a, as a career to choose to take this on. That's got to be financial insanity. Yeah. I mean, you're coming up in the ranks, you could have gone and worked for Pfizer, Maderna, and probably made a killing.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 46:00
Yeah, career wise, it was, it was a bad choice. The you and I have both faced this right. And everybody in the movement has faced this, which is, you see the pattern in the data? And then you have a choice to make? Do you take a dive, and pretend you didn't see what you just saw? Or do you stand up and tell the truth. And you and I have both made the hard decision to stand up and tell the truth. And there are enormous costs to that. You and I are both hunted by the pharmaceutical industry. They have people watch everything that we say and everything that we write. And they send people after us that they censor our work, they put out hit pieces on us. It's It's madness that we have to put up with this because all that you and I want is an honest process, a fair process, clean data to make good decisions. And for that, we are vilified. But I will add this is a unique moment in history, which is unprecedented censorship, unprecedented power and control from the pharmaceutical industry. We're seeing the emergence of a sorta global pharma totalitarianism where they are controlling the regulatory state where they're saving elections where they're saving laws all to increase their profits while harming the public. But the public is figuring this out. And and the truth is routing around the censorship. So substack has been wonderful for our community because there's no censorship there. And people are free to tell the truth on that site. And so the people who are banned from Twitter, Instagram and Facebook now have substack accounts where we do long form journalism, where we explain to people exactly what's happening and we, we provide data links, that sort of thing, all sorts of things that the FDA and CDC should do, but don't do and the public is finding us so I have this massive audience on on substack and almost small fish compared to some of the other accounts like Alex Berenson, Alex Alex Berenson, Steve Kerr's Jeff Childers at COVID and coffee. And then there's some anonymous accounts that are very good, YouTube, he is a god Tomasulo do extraordinary work, regression analysis, sifting data from around the world. And people are finding our work and and, and people can subscribe to my work for free, but they can also do paid subscriptions as well. And so we're actually able to make a living off of telling the truth. And so it's such a strange moment, because intellectually, I'm invigorated by the fact that the people are figuring this out doing Epidemiology from below, and rising up to take control of their lives and to overthrow the pharmaceutical industry. And these corrupt governments. On the other hand, we live during a time of unbelievable hardship, where we're where the pharmaceutical industry in collusion with government is taking actions on a daily basis that we know increase suffering in the world. And, and so we just have to keep the faith and keep pushing forward because I think we will break through, I think we will be able to top all the nonsense coming out of pharma, the FDA and CDC, and the public is figuring this out. It's just gonna take a while to build up the movement, candidly, so that we're strong enough to take power and write the laws ourselves so that this never happens again.
Dr. Paul 50:01
So well put, I mean, this whole thing started in a sense way before Fauci and his gain of function work that he helped fund in Wuhan. And then the release, whether it was accidental or on purpose of this, SARS, cov, two, and then this whole nonsense with this quote, vaccine, that's just, you know, injecting mRNA, to turn ourselves into factories of Spike protein, the actual toxin that's causing all the harm. And then, of course, all the rigmarole with hospitals and incentivized programs to put people on ventilators and kill them. You're right, we've we've really harmed what was, in some ways, a very good medical system. I mean, it's had problems because of the pharma control that most people weren't aware it was going on for a very long time, I still feel like the the way forward, in addition to what you have to say, and I'm going to have you get the last word here on where we go from here, but we need to preserve the control group. And I'm going to say that there's two control groups. There's the control group of people who've never had a single vaccine in their lives, you are the absolute pure control group and your health is astounding people who are who have never been vaccinated know this, you can go to the Control group.org. And look at that data. It's incredible. But we have another super important control group. And that's those of you who have not yet had the COVID jab. Even if you've had other vaccines, there is something uniquely extraordinarily dangerous about the mRNA technology and what's been put into this COVID jab. And when we start comparing, if doctors and anybody, all of us, whenever somebody comes down with some weird ailment, myocarditis was unheard of in pediatrics, we're starting to see it all over the place. So people don't make the connection. Oh, this weird ailment has to do with the COVID jab. Well just start asking, Did you get the jab? You know, did you get the COVID vaccine. Usually, when there's an unusual new ailment, they did something that we've never had. So we start to the picture starts to become very clear of what these things are doing to our heart to harm our health. So we need to preserve the control group and and get good data out there. But this thing is a heart and soul thing, too. I want you to have the last word, where do we go from here?
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 52:24
Yeah, so I'm so glad you brought that up. So what's gonna happen over the coming months and years is the world's largest unnatural experiment. So the people who have not gotten COVID 19 shots are gonna do better against COVID. And they're gonna have fewer of these other weird side effects. And the people who have gotten these shots are gonna experience higher rates of COVID illness because these shots have negative efficacy. And they're going to experience all range of horrific side effects, heart issues, strokes, probably cancers, and all sorts of other horrible outcomes, including what they're now calling sudden adult Death Syndrome. Well, that's, that's vaccine injury, we know that. So people are going to see this, and they're going to connect the dots. And so I think our challenge going forward is to welcome new people into the movement and grow the movement and also focus on writing the laws so that when we take power, this never happens again. So I have sort of three things I'd like to see going forward. One is the next few months are going to be heartbreaking. They already are, you are going to see children dying at recess and sports class and an on the ball field and on the soccer pitch and that sort of thing. We're going to see more celebrities and famous people in the news who have injuries from these vaccines like, like Justin Bieber and his wife that we just saw, and so many other celebrities and, and sports heroes and that sort of thing, friends and family, neighbors, they're all going to be injured by the shots. That is going to cause a tremendous emotional burden on all of us. It's gonna break our hearts every day. And one of the things I think we should do is to not absorb it all, and to not take on the entire emotional burden ourselves. My advice to people is when you see a heartbreaking story, what I want you to do is I want you to print it out, if you're watching if you're reading it online, or cut it out of the newspaper, and I want you to mail it to the people at FDA and CDC who approved these sites. I have all the addresses for these people on my substack Toby rogers.substack.com, I want us to barrage them with mail from now until the shots are withdrawn from the market. And I will. And I think all you need to do in sending it to them was put a little note on it that said, this is on you, you did this. And I think we should daily send them letters to show them exactly the harms that they are causing in society. So they can't continue to live in their information bubble. The second thing I think we need to do is the medical freedom movement needs to mature, we were a small fringe group of four or 5% of the population. A few years ago, that's no longer the case, we're at least 30 to 40% of the population. Now we could be depending on how you ask the question, more than 50% of the population, we need to think
in terms of taking power, we need to think of ourselves as the majority. And we need to think not as responding to them. but rather how do we go on offense? And how do we how do we take power, every group in the medical freedom space needs to set up a 501 C for a 501. C four is a nonprofit that can do political work, can put money into campaigns can endorse candidates can do messaging in connection with campaigns, we need to reward our friends and punish our enemies. And we do not have a political wing of the movement yet. And until we do that, we're not going to be able to gain leverage over this situation. These 501 C fours can be set up in an hour you just call an attorney, they write the paperwork, you set up a board, off you go. It's best practices in every large nonprofit nationwide, that's able to make a difference on the political debate. They always have a 501 C three nonprofit that does education and 501 C four that does political, we got to do that sort of thing. In the meantime, I'm a huge fan of Jeff children's on COVID in coffee. It's a substack that reports every day on the COVID pandemic. Jeff Childers is an attorney in Florida. He's absolutely brilliant. And he does this thing called Operation multiplier. Operation multipliers anytime a politician does good by us anytime a politician tells the truth and stands up for us. Jeff Childers puts a link on his substack article that says go and donate any amount that you feel comfortable with, don't don't break the bank, but show this person that we appreciate what they did, and have the number and in the number two. So you can give $102 You can give $10.02 Any number that ends in two, so that the campaign can track that those donations came from the medical Freedom Movement. And so he generates hundreds of 1000s of dollars in donations immediately. For people like Senator Ron Johnson, who who stands up for our rights, I think we need to do a lot more of that sort of thing. I love that Jeff Childers is doing this, it makes an instant impact. And that helps our people get elected, and rewards people who are standing up and doing the right thing. So those are three things I would start with right away, in order to turn the tide and, and in all this, I think we just have to keep the faith. We have science on our side, the data is on our side logic, reason, rationality is on our side. So we just have to keep doing the work day in and day out, even though it's heartbreaking. And eventually this corrupt regime of the pharmaceutical industry in cahoots with with government, it will fall apart because their plan is not sustainable. And the work that you do is sustainable. You give life to people, you improve people's lives. And and and the work that you do is the work that we have to amplify going forward. Because that's the life giving medicine that we need not this junk science that's coming from FDA and CDC.
Dr. Paul 59:15
Wow, Dr. Toby Rogers, thank you for that wrap up. We've got a call to action here, folks. And I love the fact that you ended on a positive note. We are in the right, we have the data, we have the science, we have the logic, and we've got heart and we've got love and we're going to do what we can to save everybody that's willing to listen and just wake up to what's actually going on. So thank you for that.
Toby Rogers, Ph.D. 59:41
You bet. Well, thank you so much for having me on your show. I'm such a huge fan of your work and I read everything you put out and it's just so nourishing for the soul and improves lives and improves health. I'm just so grateful for your courage day in and day out. And I absolutely believe that we're gonna prevail. We're gonna win This fight is just we have to keep keep the faith keep doing the work and eventually we're gonna win out. It's it's only a matter of time. Yeah.
Dr. Paul 1:00:09
Amen brother. Thank you. Thank you
Dr. Paul. Thanks for watching the show. Please visit doctors and science.com. There you can access our members only section. This show is member supported. We don't have to take sponsors. We don't have to have anybody controlling the content of our show. This is a huge perk most people aren't aware of your membership gives you access to my eBooks, transcripts of every show, PowerPoints from talks I'm giving around the country and live bonus peeks at behind the scenes work. We're doing my off the cuff thoughts and reviews on current events. Your support makes all this possible. Thank you. Help me spread the truth and share this on social media and with your friends at doctors and science.com. I look forward to running with you against the wind. Go to our website doctors and science.com Sign up. Donate if you can. And let's make this the weekly show the nation has been waiting for. I'm Dr. Paul
Transcribed by https://otter.ai
Support Dr. Paul:
TAKE ADVANTAGE OF DR PAUL'S 25% PROFESSIONAL DISCOUNT APPLIED AT CHECKOUT
Dr. Paul's Safe and Effective Approach to Immunity and Health- from Pregnancy Through Your Child's Teen Years.
The Vaccine-Friendly Plan is a place to start researching your decision on whether or not to vaccinate according to the CDC recommendations.
Dr. Paul's book, The Vaccine-Friendly Plan, may not align with his latest findings on the Vaxxed-Unvaxxed data. However, it still serves as a valuable tool for those who follow the CDC schedule. The book offers peer-reviewed information encouraging parents and guardians to think critically about vaccine decisions. While Dr. Paul cautions against following the Vaccine-Friendly Plan, it can still be a helpful resource for those seeking a starting point for their vaccine journey.
Dr. Paul's research: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/22/8674/pdf, though wrongfully retracted as shown in this study: Revisiting Excess Diagnoses of Illnesses and Conditions in Children Whose Parents Provided Informed Permission to Vaccinate clearly shows that those children who were not vaccinated were much healthier than those who followed the Vaccine-Friendly Plan.
Opiate addiction is the single most significant public health crisis facing Americans—it affects over 2 million people and kills 115 of them every day.